Page 1 of 2

More Rolls Royce additions:

Posted: Sun Oct 02, 2016 8:06 pm
by Ecclesley
GLM 1937 Phantom III Freestone and Webb Sedanca de Ville, chassis 3CP38
big-620059132e.jpg
big-620059132e.jpg (52.35 KiB) Viewed 610 times
TSM 1966 Phantom VI Park Ward
big-6200590b7f.jpg
big-6200590b7f.jpg (47.28 KiB) Viewed 610 times
GLM Phantom III Hooper Sports Limousine, chassis 3BT85
big-6200589e2f.jpg
big-6200589e2f.jpg (54.78 KiB) Viewed 610 times

Re: More Rolls Royce additions:

Posted: Sun Oct 02, 2016 8:16 pm
by GHOSTHUNTER
Fabulous additions to your collection Gerrit. I think the 'GLM' models are superb and must find a way of getting one to study it in close detail because they do look accurate, but the 'TSM' Phantom VI does not, there is something about their models their models that just misses the mark, maybe I'm getting too critical in my old age... :D

Ghosthunter.

Re: More Rolls Royce additions:

Posted: Mon Oct 03, 2016 5:31 pm
by Ecclesley
GHOSTHUNTER wrote: but the 'TSM' Phantom VI does not, there is something about their models that just misses the mark, maybe I'm getting too critical in my old age... :D

Ghosthunter.
TSM screwed up again calling this a PVI, like they did with the James Young model. The first PVI delivered in Nov 1968; this model is quoted being from 1966, so it is a PV.
Another thing: a PVI has side indicators on the front wings, this one hasn't. Then we have the coachbuilder, stated as Park Ward, this is wrong, from Nov 1962 it all became MPW.

But it is a fine looking model anyway.

Re: More Rolls Royce additions:

Posted: Mon Oct 03, 2016 6:00 pm
by GHOSTHUNTER
Ecclesley wrote:
GHOSTHUNTER wrote: but the 'TSM' Phantom VI does not, there is something about their models that just misses the mark, maybe I'm getting too critical in my old age... :D

Ghosthunter.
TSM screwed up again calling this a PVI, like they did with the James Young model. The first PVI delivered in Nov 1968; this model is quoted being from 1966, so it is a PV.
Another thing: a PVI has side indicators on the front wings, this one hasn't. Then we have the coachbuilder, stated as Park Ward, this is wrong, from Nov 1962 it all became MPW.

But it is a fine looking model anyway.
Thank's Gerrit, I do remember discussing the TSM Phantom cars issue elsewhere, such a shame they can make such mistakes.

Ghosthunter.

Re: More Rolls Royce additions:

Posted: Mon Oct 03, 2016 6:44 pm
by Ecclesley
By the way Kevin, I sold my Shadow last week Wednesday.
All I have now are my happy memories, especially those of the flying lady.
img-6194407481.jpg
img-6194407481.jpg (82.56 KiB) Viewed 574 times

Re: More Rolls Royce additions:

Posted: Tue Oct 04, 2016 12:37 am
by GHOSTHUNTER
OK Gerrit, thank's for the update. I hope things are coming good for you at the moment and all is working out as planned. I am sure the New Year will be as exciting for you without the Rolls-Royce and maybe one Day you'll get another dream car.

Love the flying Lady postcard :D

Ghosthunter.

Re: More Rolls Royce additions:

Posted: Tue Oct 04, 2016 1:16 am
by Miller
GHOSTHUNTER wrote:
Love the flying Lady postcard :D
...even if she is unable to fly for aerodynamic reasons :mrgreen:

Re: More Rolls Royce additions:

Posted: Tue Oct 04, 2016 1:48 pm
by Fox
I'm trying such a flying lady on a RR grille. And I'm laughing

Re: More Rolls Royce additions:

Posted: Tue Oct 04, 2016 2:36 pm
by GHOSTHUNTER
Fox wrote:I'm trying such a flying lady on a RR grille. And I'm laughing
Don't let Her fall off, you'll never pick her up... :lol:

Ghosty.

Re: More Rolls Royce additions:

Posted: Tue Oct 04, 2016 7:50 pm
by RoutemasterNL
Ecclesley wrote:By the way Kevin, I sold my Shadow last week Wednesday.
All I have now are my happy memories, especially those of the flying lady.
img-6194407481.jpg
Now where have I seen this drawing before.......

Best Regards:RoutemasterNL