43a Hillman Minx
Posted: Mon Jul 06, 2015 7:44 pm
The NAMC’s “Catalog of all Series Matchbox Models” (second edition) does not contain any variations not already listed by Nick, and neither does the AIM's “1-75 Series Regular Wheels” catalogue (second printing, 1983), although both comment on light and dark KGPW being found on this model.
Stannard does not list any new variations either, but Houghton has two plausible additions to the table: 43a-9 is Nick's code 8 (blue-grey, 9.5 x 20 GPW, d/c, post 1, roof, trim 1) but with a gloss black baseplate, and 4a-11 is Nick's code 9 ((blue-grey, 9.5 x 20 GPW, d/c, post 1, roof, trim 2) also with a gloss black baseplate. If confirmed, each of these variations would simply slot in after the matt black baseplate variation already listed.Houghton also comments on the existence of light and dark KGPW.
U.K. Matchbox examined the model in Vol. 1, no. 11 (Jan. '78) p175 but does not list any new variations. However, Rob Newson does suggest that the rows of pips at the front and rear of the inside of the roof might represent an abortive attempt to fit windows front and rear.
Update: Looking at Nick's variation table, variation codes 12 and 14 appear to be identical. However, looking at how the listing is built up, I think varition code 14 should have 'post 2' rather than 'post 1'.
Stannard does not list any new variations either, but Houghton has two plausible additions to the table: 43a-9 is Nick's code 8 (blue-grey, 9.5 x 20 GPW, d/c, post 1, roof, trim 1) but with a gloss black baseplate, and 4a-11 is Nick's code 9 ((blue-grey, 9.5 x 20 GPW, d/c, post 1, roof, trim 2) also with a gloss black baseplate. If confirmed, each of these variations would simply slot in after the matt black baseplate variation already listed.Houghton also comments on the existence of light and dark KGPW.
U.K. Matchbox examined the model in Vol. 1, no. 11 (Jan. '78) p175 but does not list any new variations. However, Rob Newson does suggest that the rows of pips at the front and rear of the inside of the roof might represent an abortive attempt to fit windows front and rear.
Update: Looking at Nick's variation table, variation codes 12 and 14 appear to be identical. However, looking at how the listing is built up, I think varition code 14 should have 'post 2' rather than 'post 1'.