Page 1 of 2
Superfast Casting # 16
Posted: Mon Sep 29, 2014 8:37 pm
by GHOSTHUNTER
Re: Superfast Casting # 16
Posted: Mon Sep 29, 2014 8:44 pm
by GHOSTHUNTER
No matter what I do with the above images, they will not post 'IN ORDER'...!
Ghosty.
Re: Superfast Casting # 16
Posted: Tue Feb 16, 2016 5:05 am
by Brad Pittiful
#16 case tractor yes/no?
Re: Superfast Casting # 16
Posted: Tue Feb 16, 2016 1:45 pm
by GHOSTHUNTER
Brad Pittiful wrote:#16 case tractor yes/no?
As it is a 1969 issued model and comes in a 'Superfast' type box, putting it in the range on a technical basis, I think it should be included.
Ghosthunter.
Re: Superfast Casting # 16
Posted: Tue Feb 16, 2016 1:56 pm
by motorman
Brad Pittiful wrote:#16 case tractor yes/no?
Go on

Re: Superfast Casting # 16
Posted: Thu Feb 18, 2016 9:28 am
by Taniwha
The army version from the twin-pack is definitely a Superfast model...
Cheers,
Gavin
Re: Superfast Casting # 16
Posted: Thu Feb 18, 2016 10:50 am
by Rob
Taniwha wrote:The army version from the twin-pack is definitely a Superfast model...
Cheers,
Gavin
Totally agree Gavin, here is a comparison photo of the Olive and rarer Olive Drab Case Tractors. Quite hard now to find the Olive Drab models as they were only produced for a short while.
Re: Superfast Casting # 16
Posted: Mon Feb 20, 2017 11:16 pm
by fixer
Why do some gold firebird bases have no number, I know that they're the earlier issues was it just forgot
Re: Superfast Casting # 16
Posted: Tue Feb 21, 2017 1:06 am
by Rob
fixer wrote:Why do some gold firebird bases have no number, I know that they're the earlier issues was it just forgot
Hi Reg, this was a model only made with England base for 2 years between 1980 and 1982, bases can be unpainted and silver painted. Some bases say No.16 PONTIAC and some just say PONTIAC. The later issues that were made in Macau only said PONTIAC and my understanding has always been that the ones made in England with the No.16 were the earlier ones.
Re: Superfast Casting # 16
Posted: Tue Feb 21, 2017 9:28 pm
by fixer
Thanks Rob
I was referring to the England bases I have them unpainted with and without numbers and it's obvious the number is a later addition and was curious, maybe they hadn't decided on it's position in the range when the first bases were cast.......probably me getting it all ar$e about face