63b Alvis Foamite Crash Tender
63b Alvis Foamite Crash Tender
The NAMC’s “Catalog of all Series Matchbox Models” (first edition) does not contain any unlisted variations.
Both the AIM “1-75 Series Regular Wheels” catalogue (second printing, 1983) and Houghton list what could be a precursor to Nick's code 9 (AIM's 63-2c and Houghton's 63b-7). This is the eight triangular brace baseplate, but with two rectangular holes (i.e. no springs fitted). Is this a genuine variation or is it merely an error piece?
U.K. Matchbox did not cover the model.
Both the AIM “1-75 Series Regular Wheels” catalogue (second printing, 1983) and Houghton list what could be a precursor to Nick's code 9 (AIM's 63-2c and Houghton's 63b-7). This is the eight triangular brace baseplate, but with two rectangular holes (i.e. no springs fitted). Is this a genuine variation or is it merely an error piece?
U.K. Matchbox did not cover the model.
Re: 63b
Stannard mentioned that this variation with the 8 brace base with open spring holes and no springs was reported to him, but he must have not seen this variation himself in England, so failed to catalog it. They were shipped to our stores here in America that way, we found and still have them, so are a well known variation. They are definitely not just an error Idris. Collectors here like myself find it strange that Mike did not verify the variation himself with any of our well known U.S. collectors over here, but knew enough about it to mention it in his 1985 Guide?? Bob Brennen also had this one listed in the 1973 Second printing of his NAMC Guide, but indicated he didn't have an example of it in his collection at that time (yet). kwakers
Re: 63b Alvis Foamite Crash Tender
Hi,
just noted this little difference on my two Salamander crash tender.
Stephan
just noted this little difference on my two Salamander crash tender.
Stephan
Re: 63b Alvis Foamite Crash Tender
...or is that casting flash?Malibu wrote:just noted this little difference on my two Salamander crash tender.
Re: 63b Alvis Foamite Crash Tender
Looks like flash to me.Idris wrote:...or is that casting flash?Malibu wrote:just noted this little difference on my two Salamander crash tender.
MOTORMAN
"Kill all my demons and my angels will die too"
"Kill all my demons and my angels will die too"
Re: 63b Alvis Foamite Crash Tender
Hard to tell without seeing the model in-hand, but I'm thinking flash, too.
My other musings:
http://diecastcarpark.blogspot.com/
http://diecastcarpark.blogspot.com/
Re: 63b Alvis Foamite Crash Tender
Thank you all.
Could it be that the injection point was there?
Stephan
Could it be that the injection point was there?
Stephan
Re: 63b Alvis Foamite Crash Tender
Its not a flash on a single model, its a defective die! As we have several variation basing on broken dies, one should consider this as a variation, or, if its not worth to be a legit variation, it should be mentioned in the guide with a photo.
Here is why
3 of my 5 foamite got this "flash"
I´d say check yours![/b]
Here is why
3 of my 5 foamite got this "flash"
I´d say check yours![/b]
Roland
Variations are bad for limited showcases
Variations are bad for limited showcases
Re: 63b Alvis Foamite Crash Tender
Thanks for having a look at your models.
Stephan
Stephan
Re: 63b Alvis Foamite Crash Tender
The Foamite must have been popular, because it's one of those models that often arrives in a bulk lot, usually in awful condition, lacking paint, without plastic parts and always with a broken nozzle. The arrival of a Foamite in decent condition made me check the variations I have, and I discovered this one:green plastic springs back in 2014 but I don't think anyone has posted one since. He also mentions a white-springed version in Hardy's shop - mine has white springs, confirming the existence of this wheel variation with both spring colours.
The condition is awful, but it has 12.5x30 wheels, instead of the usual 12.5x40.
Antonin reported this variation with