65b Jaguar 3.8 litre Saloon
Posted: Sun May 25, 2014 8:53 am
The NAMC’s “Catalog of all Series Matchbox Models” (first edition) states that the non-metallic version comes in both "light red and red" whilst the AIM “1-75 Series Regular Wheels” catalogue (second printing, 1983) comments only that the body colour is subject to several shades.
Neither Stannard nor Houghton has any variations not already listed by Nick.
U.K. Matchbox covered the model twice, both in vol. 1, no. 11 (Jan. '78), p174 and in vol 7, no. 2 (Jun '83), p43 with follow-ups in vol. 7, no. 3 (Aug '83), p94 and vol. 7, no. 4 (Oct '83), p125. The non-metallic shades were described as "dark red to dusky dark pink" in 1978, but by 1983 this had become "non-metallic red of various and considerable shades". Both articles commented on a casting variation to the underside of the bonnet which had a recess on earlier castings, but a central raised boss on later ones. The June 1983 article contains a list of variations where the wheel sizes are consistently 0.5 mm below those reported by Nick. However, since Nick's table agrees with other sources, I would suggest that this is a merely the result of a zeroing error and so do not propose to detail the alleged variations here.
The final UK Matchbox update in August 1983 provides details of a blue 65b which, at that time, was owned by John Marshall of California.The colour is the same as that of the non-metallic 65a. The baseplate is the usual silver-grey on both sides and it is fitted with SPW. There is no glazing unit, but there is a windows rivet present and it was concluded that this represented a pre-production model. (Obviously it would be more reasonable for this model to be metallic blue - c.f. the metallic green 23b. I would suggest that the fact that it is painted non-metallic blue and has no windows points to it being a very early pre-production, pre-dating the switch of the 65a to metallic paint. This could be an indication that either the launch of the 65b was delayed, or the period during which the 65a was painted metallic blue was considerably shorter than the number of survivors would suggest.)
Neither Stannard nor Houghton has any variations not already listed by Nick.
U.K. Matchbox covered the model twice, both in vol. 1, no. 11 (Jan. '78), p174 and in vol 7, no. 2 (Jun '83), p43 with follow-ups in vol. 7, no. 3 (Aug '83), p94 and vol. 7, no. 4 (Oct '83), p125. The non-metallic shades were described as "dark red to dusky dark pink" in 1978, but by 1983 this had become "non-metallic red of various and considerable shades". Both articles commented on a casting variation to the underside of the bonnet which had a recess on earlier castings, but a central raised boss on later ones. The June 1983 article contains a list of variations where the wheel sizes are consistently 0.5 mm below those reported by Nick. However, since Nick's table agrees with other sources, I would suggest that this is a merely the result of a zeroing error and so do not propose to detail the alleged variations here.
The final UK Matchbox update in August 1983 provides details of a blue 65b which, at that time, was owned by John Marshall of California.The colour is the same as that of the non-metallic 65a. The baseplate is the usual silver-grey on both sides and it is fitted with SPW. There is no glazing unit, but there is a windows rivet present and it was concluded that this represented a pre-production model. (Obviously it would be more reasonable for this model to be metallic blue - c.f. the metallic green 23b. I would suggest that the fact that it is painted non-metallic blue and has no windows points to it being a very early pre-production, pre-dating the switch of the 65a to metallic paint. This could be an indication that either the launch of the 65b was delayed, or the period during which the 65a was painted metallic blue was considerably shorter than the number of survivors would suggest.)