2c Muir Hill Dumper

All regular wheel 1-75 or miniatures topics
Locked
User avatar
Brad Pittiful
Posts: 1265
Joined: Sun Sep 15, 2013 5:03 pm
Location: The Tardis

2c Muir Hill Dumper

Post by Brad Pittiful »

i was going through some cases today and i found a couple of muir hill dumpers and i checked the base for the newly found no hole variation...well they both had holes...but i noticed one hole was smaller than the other...i took a pic and i think you can see the size different

i tried measuring but its a tight fit and i kept getting different results...so i gave up


Image
Please use a web hosting site (like photobucket) to store pictures so you can post them here, using attachments makes it hard to view the pictures when you have to scroll to see them. Seeing comparisons of models is hard to see with attachments too.
matchboxkiwi
Posts: 858
Joined: Sun Sep 15, 2013 7:18 pm

Re: 2c Muir Hill Dumper

Post by matchboxkiwi »

Looks like you have two different sized front wheels on that right hand casting!
What's the story with these holes in bases? There seems to be a handful of different regular wheels models with these holes. They also seem to be on the earlier castings of each model, so are they pre-production models or something?

Cheers Steve
Matchboxkiwi
GHOSTHUNTER
Moderator
Posts: 12249
Joined: Sun Sep 15, 2013 4:12 pm

Re: 2c Muir Hill Dumper

Post by GHOSTHUNTER »

I agree, the highlighted BPW looks to be thinner than the others and the highlighted injector rings are larger.

Further evidence to Lesney using two sets of moulds for maximum production capacity, I do not know what purpose the holes on this model serve.

If you do want to measure the holes, carefully place a piece of thin, cone-shaped card in the hole, and with a really sharp pointed pencil, draw round the card while its in the hole, take the card out, open it up and measure the line on the card, with practice you will master this for any future casting holes etc.

GHOSTHUNTER.
Attachments
2Cmuirhilldumperbaseholedifferentsizes001_zpsc137e345.jpg
2Cmuirhilldumperbaseholedifferentsizes001_zpsc137e345.jpg (62.83 KiB) Viewed 1274 times
User avatar
Idris
Site Admin
Posts: 5940
Joined: Sun Sep 15, 2013 6:10 pm
Location: Denbigshire, Wales

Re: 2c Muir Hill Dumper

Post by Idris »

GHOSTHUNTER wrote:I do not know what purpose the holes on this model serve.
We've discussed this previously and the conclusion was the the addition of holes to the baseplates marked the move away from the spray painting of loose components lying horizontally on a chain belt to the same components being suspended vertically on hooks. (I assume this gave better paint coverage and may even have removed the need to turn parts over in order to obtain even coverage on both sides.)
GHOSTHUNTER
Moderator
Posts: 12249
Joined: Sun Sep 15, 2013 4:12 pm

Re: 2c Muir Hill Dumper

Post by GHOSTHUNTER »

Hello Idris, yes I was fully aware of the reason you give and have seen pictures of models being sprayed in this way, on hooks, but when the castings have natural holes, such as this one does, the axle housings, I wonder why they would introduce more holes!

GHOSTHUNTER.
User avatar
Idris
Site Admin
Posts: 5940
Joined: Sun Sep 15, 2013 6:10 pm
Location: Denbigshire, Wales

Re: 2c Muir Hill Dumper

Post by Idris »

GHOSTHUNTER wrote:Hello Idris, yes I was fully aware of the reason you give and have seen pictures of models being sprayed in this way, on hooks, but when the castings have natural holes, such as this one does, the axle housings, I wonder why they would introduce more holes!
My guess would be that the new holes were positioned such that the component would hang evenly, i.e they are on the centreline of the casting. Presumably this meant that the hooks could be spaced closer together (especially if they also rotated in order to facilitate even paint distribution).
GHOSTHUNTER
Moderator
Posts: 12249
Joined: Sun Sep 15, 2013 4:12 pm

Re: 2c Muir Hill Dumper

Post by GHOSTHUNTER »

AH YES! I can see that, thank's Idris.

GHOSTHUNTER.
User avatar
ChFalkensteiner
Posts: 566
Joined: Sun Sep 15, 2013 3:45 pm
Location: Linz, Austria
Contact:

Re: 2c Muir Hill Dumper

Post by ChFalkensteiner »

Brad Pittiful wrote:i was going through some cases today and i found a couple of muir hill dumpers and i checked the base for the newly found no hole variation...well they both had holes...but i noticed one hole was smaller than the other...i took a pic and i think you can see the size different

i tried measuring but its a tight fit and i kept getting different results...so i gave up
Hi Dan,

Methinks that the two models in your picture are examples of the earlier and later casting, respectively, with the thinner and thicker axle supports.

Having looked at the models in my own collection, I believe that all early castings with the thinner axle supports have a slightly smaller hole (that is if they do have a hole!) and all late castings with the thicker axle supports have a slightly larger hole.

So no additional variation this time - I think!
User avatar
Brad Pittiful
Posts: 1265
Joined: Sun Sep 15, 2013 5:03 pm
Location: The Tardis

Re: 2c Muir Hill Dumper

Post by Brad Pittiful »

thanks for your input Christian!
Please use a web hosting site (like photobucket) to store pictures so you can post them here, using attachments makes it hard to view the pictures when you have to scroll to see them. Seeing comparisons of models is hard to see with attachments too.
Locked