The Scarcity Intensity Scale

An area for less experienced collectors to ask questions and show their finds.
User avatar
fixer
Moderator
Posts: 3655
Joined: Sun Sep 15, 2013 4:59 pm
Location: basildon essex

Re: The Scarcity Intensity Scale

Post by fixer »

beautiful
reg
User avatar
Squid
Posts: 701
Joined: Sat Nov 28, 2015 2:35 am
Location: Michigan, USA
Contact:

Re: The Scarcity Intensity Scale

Post by Squid »

Maybe we should use a 1-10 scale, in the manner that is often used to rate condition? It would be something like 1 is very commonly found even in factory-fresh condition, where a 10 is extremely hard to find in any condition. In rare cases, a 10+ could also be used.
GHOSTHUNTER
Moderator
Posts: 12249
Joined: Sun Sep 15, 2013 4:12 pm

Re: The Scarcity Intensity Scale

Post by GHOSTHUNTER »

What happens when we have our 10+ model and something turns up that proved to be even harder to find. The #13 Dodge Wreck Truck from 1965, was painted in a colour scheme said to have been disliked by the company it represented, 'BP'. The colour scheme was simply swapped so the cab unit was now Yellow and the rear deck was in Green. This action means the first 1965 version is very hard to find and we may well like to class it as a 10+ model.

In 1969-70, the same castings were put together and painted to match that very first 1965 version. It was done for a select number of members for an American Matchbox collectors club, 24 examples in fact, now when this version comes up for sale, it very nearly is as expensive as the first version and we know there were only 24 examples made, and maybe not all of them have survived, what can we give this model, a 10++ or 11?

Ghosthunter.
User avatar
Squid
Posts: 701
Joined: Sat Nov 28, 2015 2:35 am
Location: Michigan, USA
Contact:

Re: The Scarcity Intensity Scale

Post by Squid »

GHOSTHUNTER wrote:What happens when we have our 10+ model and something turns up that proved to be even harder to find. The #13 Dodge Wreck Truck from 1965, was painted in a colour scheme said to have been disliked by the company it represented, 'BP'. The colour scheme was simply swapped so the cab unit was now Yellow and the rear deck was in Green. This action means the first 1965 version is very hard to find and we may well like to class it as a 10+ model.

In 1969-70, the same castings were put together and painted to match that very first 1965 version. It was done for a select number of members for an American Matchbox collectors club, 24 examples in fact, now when this version comes up for sale, it very nearly is as expensive as the first version and we know there were only 24 examples made, and maybe not all of them have survived, what can we give this model, a 10++ or 11?
I'd just stop with 10+. Models of known small quantities would best fit into that bracket. Being that nothing in my collection would have an assigned 1-10 rarity of more than 3, I'm just positing that a 1-10 scale might be a little less arbitrary than verbiage...I'd leave the logistics behind assigning numbers to collectors who are more experienced than I.
User avatar
Miller
Posts: 680
Joined: Mon Jan 25, 2016 12:22 am
Location: Germany

Re: The Scarcity Intensity Scale

Post by Miller »

This whole thing is like beating a dead horse. How much people would recognize this list? Most people here are or get educated about the rarity of some models. Outside of our little world no one will care...

Looking at ebay every second RW is described as rare and must have massive golden axles depending on the prices for the offered mass products. People see shops with crazy prices and think they sell the holy grail.
Roland


Variations are bad for limited showcases
User avatar
Ewan
Posts: 783
Joined: Sun Sep 15, 2013 2:48 pm
Location: Isle of Benbecula

Re: The Scarcity Intensity Scale

Post by Ewan »

One of my lead figures book uses the following guide which I quite like. It also doesn't feature a price guide which I quite like too as I like finding something rare but couldn't care less about value.

A = Unique (for Lesney purposes could this cover pre-pros?)
B = Very Rare (the rarest of production models such as the red Victor?)
C = Rare
D = Relatively Common
E = Common
starni999
Posts: 470
Joined: Mon Sep 16, 2013 7:47 pm

Re: The Scarcity Intensity Scale

Post by starni999 »

Really hard to define this one.
I honestly don't think anybody will ever come up with a foolproof system of defining rarity. It's all in the eye of the beholder.
I really don't like the phrase "hard to find", even though I use it myself!
No model is hard to find, the most "HTF" Dinky is probably the HG Loose van, it's not hard to find, I know exactly where it is, and if I had £20,000 spare it would be mine.
Chris Warr.
User avatar
motorman
Moderator
Posts: 6863
Joined: Sun Sep 15, 2013 6:09 pm
Location: Glasgow, Scotland

Re: The Scarcity Intensity Scale

Post by motorman »

starni999 wrote:Really hard to define this one.
I honestly don't think anybody will ever come up with a foolproof system of defining rarity. It's all in the eye of the beholder.
I really don't like the phrase "hard to find", even though I use it myself!
No model is hard to find, the most "HTF" Dinky is probably the HG Loose van, it's not hard to find, I know exactly where it is, and if I had £20,000 spare it would be mine.
Chris Warr.
Indeed Chris so maybe we need a new descriptor HTF, hard to fund!!

My wife has just butted in with a suggestion WOBM, waste of bloody money!!!!!! Thanks darling :lol: :lol:
MOTORMAN

"Kill all my demons and my angels will die too"
starni999
Posts: 470
Joined: Mon Sep 16, 2013 7:47 pm

Re: The Scarcity Intensity Scale

Post by starni999 »

Cheers mate,
When I lived at home my Ma called them DT's Dust Traps!
I've got some M,bx reg wheels that are VHTF, I know I put them in one of those boxes, in the.....loft? shed? garage?
Sorry, getting off topic...
CW.
User avatar
Squid
Posts: 701
Joined: Sat Nov 28, 2015 2:35 am
Location: Michigan, USA
Contact:

Re: The Scarcity Intensity Scale

Post by Squid »

motorman wrote:
starni999 wrote:Maybe we need a new descriptor HTF, hard to fund!!

My wife has just butted in with a suggestion WOBM, waste of bloody money!!!!!! Thanks darling :lol: :lol:
Hard To Fund is appropriate in some cases. My girlfriend will usually describe my die-cast as "cute." I'm okay with that...as Alex's wife has demonstrated, there are a lot worse things a significant other can call them!
Locked