Test

Lesney early large scale toys 1947-55 + Models of Yesteryear 1956 to date
GHOSTHUNTER
Moderator
Posts: 12249
Joined: Sun Sep 15, 2013 4:12 pm

Re: Test

Post by GHOSTHUNTER »

:lol: nice one Bob.

It is a good job you did not include the Y4 Duesenberg in a 1/43rd scale lot because that model is not 1/43rd despite what it says on the box etc. I had both the Yesteryear and Solido Duesenberg models and the yesteryear on no planet I know is 43rd scale!

Great game Bob!

Ghosty.
User avatar
YYS4BOB
Posts: 1448
Joined: Sun Sep 15, 2013 3:38 pm
Location: Sussex, England

Re: Test

Post by YYS4BOB »

GHOSTHUNTER wrote::lol: nice one Bob.

It is a good job you did not include the Y4 Duesenberg in a 1/43rd scale lot
Ghosty.
I did,(last group of 3) as that's what it says on my list!
Bob
GHOSTHUNTER
Moderator
Posts: 12249
Joined: Sun Sep 15, 2013 4:12 pm

Re: Test

Post by GHOSTHUNTER »

I never saw the last picture earlier, or else I would not have commented about the Duesenberge's scale.

Ghosty.
GHOSTHUNTER
Moderator
Posts: 12249
Joined: Sun Sep 15, 2013 4:12 pm

Re: Test

Post by GHOSTHUNTER »

Thanks for the link Bob, I had not seen those pictures before.

Ghosthunter.
GHOSTHUNTER
Moderator
Posts: 12249
Joined: Sun Sep 15, 2013 4:12 pm

Re: Test

Post by GHOSTHUNTER »

For the purists out there, the inclusion of the Yesteryear Y-6 Rolls-Royce Fire Engine by Bob in the above 'Test Game' is simply because the stated scale on the model's box is 1/48. This is a default fact because the model uses the base from the Y-7 1912 Rolls Royce from the same range of models and the stated scale for that model is 1/48.

The real car the Y-6 Fire Engine is representing had a 150 inch wheelbase (3810mm), the model has a wheelbase of 68mm. 48 x 68 = 3264 but 3810 divided by 68 = 56 making the model c1/56 scale.

Ghosthunter.
User avatar
YYS4BOB
Posts: 1448
Joined: Sun Sep 15, 2013 3:38 pm
Location: Sussex, England

Re: Test

Post by YYS4BOB »

The models were often "adapted" to make them visually more attractive. The MG in the first picture is an example of this. If it were accurately modelled, it would be narrower than the model we have. If I remember correctly, the Spot On MG was proportionally more correct than the YY example.

Image
Bob
User avatar
matchboxmarcel
Posts: 949
Joined: Sat Sep 21, 2013 1:12 pm

Re: Test

Post by matchboxmarcel »

YYS4BOB wrote:Picture 1 35
Picture 2 38
Picture 3 48

:idea: :?:
good game this was !

marcel
matchboxmarcel
User avatar
Idris
Site Admin
Posts: 5940
Joined: Sun Sep 15, 2013 6:10 pm
Location: Denbigshire, Wales

Re: Test

Post by Idris »

YYS4BOB wrote:Weighing up the answer could be a fishy business :roll:
On the basis of the above, I was wondering if the originals might all have been turbot-charged! :D
User avatar
YYS4BOB
Posts: 1448
Joined: Sun Sep 15, 2013 3:38 pm
Location: Sussex, England

Re: Test

Post by YYS4BOB »

Well it turned out to be a red herring if Ghosty's guess at that stage was anything to go by! :lol: The (cryptic) clue was a reference to "scales" but went over the head of the participants it would seem. :roll:
Bob
User avatar
Moyboy
Posts: 784
Joined: Sun Sep 15, 2013 11:25 pm
Location: Sydney, Australia
Contact:

Re: Test

Post by Moyboy »

They were all made by wheelswap Phil :D :D :D :D
Locked