52b BRM Racing Car
Re: 52b BRM Racing Car
We better give collectors a few days to check these Idris, they get to your eyes very quickly. I like counting just the bottom 'pips' over all of them (as in Stannard's Guide), but those are still very tiny pips and hard to see for we 'old folks' LOL kwakers
Re: 52b BRM Racing Car
Just trying to jolly people along!kwakers wrote:We better give collectors a few days to check these Idris, they get to your eyes very quickly.
Re: 52b BRM Racing Car
Hugh, I've checked mine, and don't think I have the variation you're after.
Cheers,
Gavin
Cheers,
Gavin
Faceless Bureaucrats have feelings too...
Re: 52b BRM Racing Car
One thing I missed out earlier and that is that the red version was shown on Lefora in a blister pack with box. This means that it was made available for purchase outside the G4 "Race 'n' Rally" gift set.
Re: 52b BRM Racing Car
Hi Hugh.
Another attempt to help you.
Collectors Regards, Mike
Another attempt to help you.
Collectors Regards, Mike
- Attachments
-
- DSCN1402.JPG (134.99 KiB) Viewed 1540 times
-
- DSCN1400.JPG (163.95 KiB) Viewed 1540 times
-
- DSCN1397.JPG (150.74 KiB) Viewed 1540 times
Mike & Nico from Austria.
Re: 52b BRM Racing Car
Thank you, Mike. That looks like another exhaust brackets/4 pips/large text example.mike wrote:Hi Hugh.
Another attempt to help you.
Collectors Regards, Mike
Re: 52b BRM Racing Car
On the basis of the feedback received, I now believe that the opening post in this topic should have read as follows:
"The NAMC’s “Catalog of all Series Matchbox Models” (second edition) does not have any variations not already listed by Nick and neither does the AIM “1-75 Series Regular Wheels” catalogue (second printing, 1983). Both catalogues note the existence of two different positions of the base text, but explain these away as paired moulds in use during the whole of the model's lifetime.
Nick's listing contains two mistakes. The first is a transcription error from Stannard - the with and without decal guide body variations are reversed, so apparently the majority of models carrying decals did not have guides, whilst those bearing labels did! In addition, Nick's listings repeat an error made by Stannard, namely that the base listed as exhaust brackets/4 pips/large text should instead read exhaust brackets/3 pips/large text. Taking all that into account, Stannard lists a variation at 52(B) 2-12 not in Nick's list: red/5 label/exhaust brackets/4 pips/small text/with guides. This would slot in as code 18.
Houghton has only a single variation not covered by Nick: 52b-12 is red/5 label/exhaust brackets/4 pips/small text/with guides. This matches the missing Stannard code. (Unsurprising since Houghton's listings are, for the most part, based on Stannard although, in this particular case, he has identified and corrected both errors.)
U.K. Matchbox did not cover the model in any depth, although a pre-production example with a plain base is pictured and examined in Vol 2, no. 2 (Apr. '78) p34."
"The NAMC’s “Catalog of all Series Matchbox Models” (second edition) does not have any variations not already listed by Nick and neither does the AIM “1-75 Series Regular Wheels” catalogue (second printing, 1983). Both catalogues note the existence of two different positions of the base text, but explain these away as paired moulds in use during the whole of the model's lifetime.
Nick's listing contains two mistakes. The first is a transcription error from Stannard - the with and without decal guide body variations are reversed, so apparently the majority of models carrying decals did not have guides, whilst those bearing labels did! In addition, Nick's listings repeat an error made by Stannard, namely that the base listed as exhaust brackets/4 pips/large text should instead read exhaust brackets/3 pips/large text. Taking all that into account, Stannard lists a variation at 52(B) 2-12 not in Nick's list: red/5 label/exhaust brackets/4 pips/small text/with guides. This would slot in as code 18.
Houghton has only a single variation not covered by Nick: 52b-12 is red/5 label/exhaust brackets/4 pips/small text/with guides. This matches the missing Stannard code. (Unsurprising since Houghton's listings are, for the most part, based on Stannard although, in this particular case, he has identified and corrected both errors.)
U.K. Matchbox did not cover the model in any depth, although a pre-production example with a plain base is pictured and examined in Vol 2, no. 2 (Apr. '78) p34."
Re: 52b BRM Racing Car
I hope, this is the right place to ask for it!
I have a 52b BRM Racing Car, which would make a code 1
code 1 blue body, silver base, 12.5 x 72 and 14 x 72 tyres 5 decal no exhaust brackets, 4 ribs, small text no guides
but it has guides!
What is it?
I have a 52b BRM Racing Car, which would make a code 1
code 1 blue body, silver base, 12.5 x 72 and 14 x 72 tyres 5 decal no exhaust brackets, 4 ribs, small text no guides
but it has guides!
What is it?
Roland
Variations are bad for limited showcases
Variations are bad for limited showcases
-
- Moderator
- Posts: 12249
- Joined: Sun Sep 15, 2013 4:12 pm
Re: 52b BRM Racing Car
If Roland's BRM is correct for a 'Code 1' then this is a good example of a 'Code 1a' having to be accepted.
Ghosthunter.
Ghosthunter.
Re: 52b BRM Racing Car
Hi,
today I bought this model with:
blue Body / 5 decal / no exhaust brackets / 3 ribs / small text / with guides.
This variation is not listed in Nicks list too.
Stephan
today I bought this model with:
blue Body / 5 decal / no exhaust brackets / 3 ribs / small text / with guides.
This variation is not listed in Nicks list too.
Stephan