Casting #65
Casting #65
65a Jaguar 3.4 Litre, issued 1959, length 62mm, box types B and C,
65b Jaguar 3.4 Litre, issued 1962, length 68mm, box types C-D and E.
65c Class Combine Harvester, issued 1967, length 76mm, box types E and F.
With the Silver rear number plate.
The Metalic Blue models C-A and D-R Axles.
The 65a model Glossy and Flat Black Base Plates.
Red and Metalic Red Models
Different Shades of Red.
What a difference half a millimetre makes on wheel sizes.
A new variation, on Nicks variation site the one with a Short Grille and the Jaguar Badge painted out only comes on the BPW model, but this one is on the GPW model. Is there no end too unlisted model variations. (Hurrah)
Dark Red and Light Red variations of the 65c model.
The open step variation, thanks Brad.
George T.
65b Jaguar 3.4 Litre, issued 1962, length 68mm, box types C-D and E.
65c Class Combine Harvester, issued 1967, length 76mm, box types E and F.
With the Silver rear number plate.
The Metalic Blue models C-A and D-R Axles.
The 65a model Glossy and Flat Black Base Plates.
Red and Metalic Red Models
Different Shades of Red.
What a difference half a millimetre makes on wheel sizes.
A new variation, on Nicks variation site the one with a Short Grille and the Jaguar Badge painted out only comes on the BPW model, but this one is on the GPW model. Is there no end too unlisted model variations. (Hurrah)
Dark Red and Light Red variations of the 65c model.
The open step variation, thanks Brad.
George T.
Re: Casting #65
Love the Jags (still need a metallic blue)
(mixed wheels)
(mixed wheels)
-
- Posts: 858
- Joined: Sun Sep 15, 2013 7:18 pm
Re: Casting #65
Was the blue Jaguar originally going to be a different number in the range? The reason I ask is the number on the base plate is on a raised block as if there was another number under it and at the last minute it was changed!
Cheers, Steve
Cheers, Steve
Re: Casting #65
There seems to be two variations on the silver trim paint to the license tags. Some are very rectangular like USA style and others are more square in shape. I only see the rectangular shape variation represented thus far in the thread.
It might be time to start my "Bucket List."
Re: Casting #65
It might be time to start my "Bucket List."
Re: Casting #65
Hello Joe (tinman) in all my years of collecting I have never come across the 65a model with the Silver Square number plate like the one
you show.
Even the one on Nicks variation site only shows it with the rectangular Silver number plate, and no mention of there being rectangular or the larger square as your one.
George T.
you show.
Even the one on Nicks variation site only shows it with the rectangular Silver number plate, and no mention of there being rectangular or the larger square as your one.
George T.
Re: Casting #65
I've found of three of them. Kwakers has one of them. Not all have red tail lights, but none had silver tail lights. I don't recall ever seeing one with silver tail lights.
It might be time to start my "Bucket List."
Re: Casting #65
Interesting, perhaps indicating a single, miss-cut mask leading to one small batch of square rear-numberplate models ending up in a small geographical area.Tinman wrote:I've found a three of them. Kwakers has one of them. Not all have red tail lights, but none had silver tail lights. I don't recall ever seeing one with silver tail lights.
Re: Casting #65
Love the Jag with the different wheels. Nice oops. Thanks for showing.
Mbox2000 / Jay