RW#13 Reverse wrecker, Too good to be true??

All regular wheel 1-75 or miniatures topics
Locked
User avatar
motorman
Moderator
Posts: 6863
Joined: Sun Sep 15, 2013 6:09 pm
Location: Glasgow, Scotland

RW#13 Reverse wrecker, Too good to be true??

Post by motorman »

I know the rules about posting details of ebay listings whilst they are live but this surely merits a mention.

Too good to be true? What do you think?

I just love the opening line of the description of all ebay listings this seller has:

"I grew up surrounded by Matchbox cars because of my father’s life-long collection. Today I have the honor of getting his treasures back into the hands of fellow collectors…"

http://www.ebay.co.uk/itm/Matchbox-13D- ... 3ce73d2a13

This is the same seller who is listing the SF#12 in blue
MOTORMAN

"Kill all my demons and my angels will die too"
godsey1
Posts: 143
Joined: Mon Sep 16, 2013 10:16 pm

Re: RW#13 Reverse wrecker, Too good to be true??

Post by godsey1 »

I am more interested in the blue Land Rover. I have been looking at it for a little while now and stopping myself from bidding on it for right now.

Tony
kwakers
Posts: 1453
Joined: Sun Sep 15, 2013 7:20 pm

Re: RW#13 Reverse wrecker, Too good to be true??

Post by kwakers »

I will pass on the reverse color 13 Wrecker, the base rivets are showing metal fatigue all around the outside of both of them. As on any rarity, if certain areas are not factory perfect, as in the lack of perfectly spun base rivets on this one, the model does not meet my standards as original. If this were a stock colored Wrecker, we would probably not give these rivets too much concern. The outer ends of any rivets can appear that way if the factory operator applied way too much pressure for too long a period of time while spinning them. It did happen, and we can find a few 'stockers' with similar looking base rivets on them. When buying a rarity for large amounts of $$, I like to see perfection on all factory rivets and axle ends as well as casting details and colors. A double standard? YES! Cheap mistakes can be displayed on a shelf with a smile. A questionable expensive rarity we buy always remains questionable, and I find it impossible to smile and be happy with them if they are not a perfectly done factory example. That is how I have collected and always felt about any Lesney rarity, others may not agree.
After seeing those base rivets, I never even bothered with the body colors or axle ends, but did see the late boom and winch ejector were proper castings for a '1970' Wrecker. (Why did he bother with having 1965 in the listing at all?) kwakers
GHOSTHUNTER
Moderator
Posts: 12249
Joined: Sun Sep 15, 2013 4:12 pm

Re: RW#13 Reverse wrecker, Too good to be true??

Post by GHOSTHUNTER »

I agree with "Kwakers" regards the very rare models having to be perfect in all areas, because of the large sums of money involved and that we do all accept lower grade 'Common' models in our collections because of the lower sums of money involved. It is however a shame that we may have in-advertantly passed on some very rare models, simply because of a slightly inferior rivet or axle-end finish and that is going to be very difficult to overcome!!

Ghosty.

P.S. Had a look at the reverse wrecker and for me, I don't like the look of the rivets or the very clean axles for the age of the model.
User avatar
ford_a_30
Posts: 395
Joined: Sun Sep 15, 2013 4:39 pm
Location: Elizabethtown Kentucky
Contact:

Re: RW#13 Reverse wrecker, Too good to be true??

Post by ford_a_30 »

Someone must be willing, it has a bid on it.
User avatar
SMS88
Posts: 1544
Joined: Mon Sep 16, 2013 12:23 am

Re: RW#13 Reverse wrecker, Too good to be true??

Post by SMS88 »

It looks like it could be one of Joe Stone´s Christmas 1969 reverse wreckers although my eyes are drawn to the stickers white not looking 100% right
User avatar
Idris
Site Admin
Posts: 5940
Joined: Sun Sep 15, 2013 6:10 pm
Location: Denbigshire, Wales

Re: RW#13 Reverse wrecker, Too good to be true??

Post by Idris »

As requested, I have moved the blue SF12c Safari Land Rover discussion to a separate thread (here).
All the discussion regarding how best to unpick the two topics has been deleted.
Locked