By no means am I offended and I'm not even sure what the exact wording was in my post (I tried to find the thread but no luck). I just wanted to make sure that the essence of my thoughts had been correctly expressed. It's clear that a tiny handful of these exist in copper with the larger wheels. Those combined with the one Greg has shown is evidence that such a thing can be produced. My thoughts are that no one would attempt to combine the triumph and the larger wheels on purpose.Idris wrote:Apologies if you think I may have misreported you, Joe - no offence intended.
It might have, but the problem is that you have to force the wheel into the forks and far down into the fender to align the hole in the wheel with the holes in the forks. Once the wheel is pushed in far enough, the forks are spread too wide for the axle to fit through both forks.Idris wrote:I'm wondering whether simply using the axle peening machine on the front axle might not have been enough to force the bottom of the forks back into shape.
You have to get the axle through one fork, push the wheel towards the first fork and force the axle through the poorly aligned hole in the wire hub and then it does not align with the hole in the other fork. Everything has to be bent over towards the loose fork and then the loose fork mashed down to align with the axle.
So here's the process that would have to be repeated over an over on an assembly line: Force the wire wheel & tire deep into place, insert the axle in one fork and force it through the wheel, bend the first fork and wheel towards the loose fork and mash that fork down into alignment with the axle ... after all this forcing, bending and mashing of the forks and wheel, then the axle end can be tooled. Not in any way is the union of this wheel and this body casting a simple or quick process. Then, as noted by many, the model will never roll.
The rear axle suffers as well. The tires have to be forced deep into the body to get the axle to align with everything. It takes a bit of forceful adjusting to get the axle aligned with the holes in the body and wheels (since both rear tires are jammed in and are not easy to move up or down). Of course, the rear wheels will never roll either.
This is what I have a hard time understanding; it's simply not logical that experienced assembly people would work this hard to force parts together in an obvious way that is unacceptable. I can only see it happening few and far between and then only as an error.
So, if the story is true and a triumph bodies were mistaken for Harley bodies and painted copper, then went to assembly with bins of "Harley" wheels ... how many awkward mashed together models were slowly assembled (with wheels jammed into place that would not roll) before someone:
A). Noticed the line had bogged way down and each model was taking far too long.
B). Noticed that none of the wheels would roll.
C). Noticed both of the above and called a halt to the assembly.
Since examples of copper Triumphs with "Harley" wheels are ultra rare, my guess is the error was quickly discovered and halted. IMHO, that makes these models negative variations (a mistake) and they should not be coded as a valid variation.